Form 61B Filing Requirement for Financial Institutions in India under FATCA and CRS
Global tax transparency has changed the way financial institutions handle client information and regulatory reporting. Governments across the world are increasingly cooperating to prevent tax evasion and identify offshore assets held by taxpayers in foreign jurisdictions.
India participates actively in this global compliance framework through the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) for the Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information (AEOI).
To implement these frameworks domestically, the Indian government introduced reporting obligations under Section 285BA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Rules 114F to 114H of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. Financial institutions that maintain reportable accounts must submit an annual Form 61B statement to the Indian tax authorities.
However, many organisations still face uncertainty regarding the Form 61B filing requirement for financial institutions in India under FATCA and CRS. Investment entities, funds, and financial service providers often ask practical questions such as:
- Does our entity qualify as a reporting financial institution?
- What constitutes a reportable account?
- Are investment funds and portfolio managers required to file Form 61B?
This article provides a structured and practical explanation of the legal framework, reporting obligations, and compliance requirements for financial institutions operating in India.
Global Background Behind Form 61B Reporting
FATCA: Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
The United States enacted FATCA in 2010 to address tax evasion by U.S. taxpayers holding assets outside the country. FATCA requires foreign financial institutions to identify and report accounts held by U.S. persons.
India signed an Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) with the United States on 9 July 2015 to implement FATCA reporting. Under this arrangement:
- Indian financial institutions identify accounts belonging to U.S. taxpayers.
- The institutions submit the information to the Indian tax authorities.
- The Indian authorities exchange the information with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
This framework ensures that U.S. taxpayers cannot easily hide assets in foreign jurisdictions.
CRS: Common Reporting Standard
While FATCA focuses on U.S. taxpayers, the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) applies globally.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) introduced CRS as a standardised framework that allows countries to exchange financial account information automatically.
Under CRS:
- Financial institutions identify account holders who are tax residents of foreign jurisdictions.
- Institutions report the information to their domestic tax authorities.
- Authorities exchange the information with other participating countries.
India began implementing CRS reporting from 2016 onward, and today, more than 100 jurisdictions participate in the CRS framework.
Â
Legal Framework Governing Form 61B in India
India incorporated FATCA and CRS obligations into domestic law through amendments to the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Section 285BA: Statement of Financial Transactions
Section 285BA empowers the government to require specified entities to furnish statements of financial transactions or reportable accounts.
To operationalise this provision, the government introduced Rules 114F, 114G, and 114H under the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
These rules define:
- The entities classified as Reporting Financial Institutions
- The definition of Reportable Accounts
- Due diligence procedures for identifying such accounts
- The reporting format using Form 61B
Form 61B, therefore, functions as the primary reporting instrument through which Indian financial institutions comply with FATCA and CRS obligations.
Understanding the Form 61B Filing Requirement for Financial Institutions in India
Organisations can determine their reporting obligations by following a structured four-step approach.
Step 1: Determine Whether the Entity Qualifies as a Financial Institution
Rule 114F defines a Financial Institution broadly and includes several categories of entities.
A financial institution may fall into one of the following categories:
Depository Institutions
Entities that accept deposits in the ordinary course of banking or similar business activities.
Examples include:
- Commercial banks
- Cooperative banks
- Non-banking financial institutions engaged in deposit activities
- Custodial Institutions
Entities that hold financial assets on behalf of customers.
Examples include:
- Custodian banks
- Brokerage firms
- Securities custodians
Investment Entities
Entities primarily engaged in investment, trading, or asset management activities.
Examples include:
- Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs)
- Mutual funds
- Hedge funds
- Private equity funds
- Investment managers managing client assets
Specified Insurance Companies
Insurance companies that issue or manage cash value insurance contracts or annuity contracts.
Step 2: Determine Whether the Entity Maintains Reportable Accounts
Even if an entity qualifies as a financial institution, it must file Form 61B only if it maintains reportable accounts.
Rule 114G defines a Reportable Account as a financial account held by:
- An individual who is tax resident outside India, or
- An entity with controlling persons who are foreign tax residents
Additionally, a Passive Non-Financial Entity (Passive NFE) may also trigger reporting if its controlling persons are foreign tax residents.
Example:
Suppose an Alternative Investment Fund in India accepts investments from a company incorporated in Mauritius. If the controlling shareholders of that company are tax residents of the United Kingdom, the account may qualify as a reportable account under CRS.
This identification process is critical because the reporting obligation depends entirely on the presence of such accounts.
Step 3: Conduct Due Diligence Procedures
Financial institutions must conduct due diligence under Rule 114H to identify reportable accounts.
These procedures ensure that institutions verify the tax residency status of account holders accurately.
Due Diligence for New Accounts
For accounts opened after the CRS and FATCA implementation dates, institutions must:
- Obtain self-certification of tax residency
- Verify information through KYC and AML documentation
- Confirm whether the account holder is a foreign tax resident
If the account holder confirms foreign tax residency, the institution must classify the account as reportable.
Due Diligence for Pre-Existing Accounts
For accounts opened before the implementation dates, institutions must review existing records to identify indicators of foreign residency.
Common indicators include:
- Foreign mailing or residence address
- Foreign telephone number
- Standing instructions for overseas fund transfers
- Power of attorney granted to a foreign address holder
If such indicators exist, the financial institution must obtain additional documentation or self-certification from the account holder.
Accounts exceeding USD 1 million in value are subject to enhanced due diligence procedures.
Step 4: Reporting in Form 61B
Once reportable accounts are identified, the reporting financial institution must submit the relevant information through Form 61B.
The information reported typically includes:
- Name and address of the account holder
- Tax Identification Number (TIN)
- Jurisdiction of tax residency
- Account number
- Account balance or value
- Income generated from the account
The reporting entity submits this information to the Income Tax Department through the reporting portal.
Due Date for Filing Form 61B
Financial institutions must file Form 61B by 31 May of the following calendar year.
| Reporting Year | Filing Due Date |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 31 May 2025 |
Failure to file the statement may result in penalties under Section 271FA of the Income-tax Act.
Applicability of Form 61B to Portfolio Management Services (PMS)
Portfolio Management Services often raise questions regarding CRS reporting.
A PMS provider typically:
- Advises clients on investment strategies
- Manages portfolios
- Executes trades on behalf of clients
However, in most PMS structures:
- Securities remain held in the client’s name
- Assets are maintained with a custodian or broker
Because the PMS entity does not hold the financial assets directly, it generally does not qualify as a Reporting Financial Institution under Rule 114F.
Therefore, PMS providers are typically not required to file Form 61B.
However, organisations should review their structure carefully to confirm this position.
Applicability of Form 61B to Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs)
Alternative Investment Funds usually fall within the scope of Investment Entities under Rule 114F.
AIFs:
- Pool funds from multiple investors
- Invest in securities, derivatives, or other financial instruments
- Operate through professional fund managers
Because of these characteristics, AIFs generally qualify as Reporting Financial Institutions.
If an AIF has investors who are tax residents outside India, it must:
- Conduct due diligence procedures
- Identify reportable investors
- File Form 61B annually
This requirement applies across different categories of AIFs registered with SEBI, including:
- Category I AIFs
- Category II AIFs
- Category III AIFs
Source:
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) – Alternative Investment Funds Regulations.
Practical Compliance Checklist for Financial Institutions
- Before filing Form 61B, institutions should confirm that they have completed the following steps.
- Determine whether the entity qualifies as a Reporting Financial Institution.
- Identify accounts belonging to foreign tax residents.
- Collect self-certification forms from account holders.
- Verify tax residency information through KYC documentation.
- Perform due diligence procedures under Rule 114H.
- Prepare and submit Form 61B through the reporting portal.
Key Compliance Risks to Consider
- Financial institutions must approach FATCA and CRS compliance carefully. Common risks include:
- Incorrect classification of entity status.
- Failure to identify the controlling persons of passive entities.
- Incomplete self-certification documentation.
- Errors in reporting account balances or tax residency details.
- Regulators expect institutions to establish strong internal compliance systems to mitigate these risks.
Understanding the Form 61B Filing Requirement for Financial Institutions in India under FATCA and CRS
The Form 61B filing requirement for financial institutions in India under FATCA and CRS forms a critical part of the global tax transparency framework.
Financial institutions must carefully assess whether they qualify as reporting entities and whether they maintain reportable accounts belonging to foreign tax residents.
Investment funds, asset managers, and financial service providers should implement robust compliance procedures, conduct thorough due diligence, and ensure timely reporting to the tax authorities.
A proactive approach to FATCA and CRS compliance not only ensures regulatory adherence but also strengthens institutional governance and credibility with investors and regulators.
Need Professional Guidance on Form 61B and FATCA-CRS Compliance?
Discover more from MSNA & Associates LLP
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
